Friday, January 26, 2007

Can Music Make You Smarter?












Exposing their young children to music just comes naturally to Jill and Bob Williams of Appleton.

"Music is a huge part of our life," said Jill Williams, who plays piano, and also bassoon for the UW Fox Valley Concert Band and a local woodwind quintet.

Since Rose, 3, and her baby sister, Lillian, 9 months, were born, music has been as integral a part of their lives as learning to walk and talk. Bob, a baritone with the White Heron Chorale, is always singing at home. Jill, meanwhile, is frequently practicing for concerts, or playing the piano, while Rose dances and keeps time with her castanets and baby Lillian bounces nearby in her exer-saucer.

Jill is convinced all this music exposure is paying off.

"Rose is 3 and she is reading," she said. "She has the gift of language and I can't help but believe it's because of rhythm and rhyming and the flow of music."

A growing body of research supports her observations.

Exposing a child to great music — as a listener and as a player — is good for brain development.

"Nothing activates as many areas of the brain as music," says researcher Donald A. Hodges, Covington Distinguished Professor of Music Education and director of the Music Research Institute at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro.

And to answer a question that has been floating around both scholarly and in popular culture for a while: Does music make you smarter?

"The answer is 'no' in a superficial sense," Hodges said. In 1993, experimenters claimed that listening to a Mozart sonata would make your IQ increase by eight points. Subsequent work, Hodges explained, proved that such listening would sharpen a subject's spatial-temporal relationships momentarily. After a short while, the subject would go back to being just as smart as before. Or dumb.

But, he explained, a rich environment makes a difference: "The brain: Use it or lose it. The more education you have, the more the interconnections in the brain. Music changes the brain."

It's an observation that Patricia DeCorsey, coordinator of Lawrence University's Early Childhood Music Program in Appleton, has been making for years.

"By introducing children to music, so many areas of the brain benefit at the same time, like the mathematical and language centers," said DeCorsey. "It's really a super-advantage."

DeCorsey has headed the childhood music program for 15 years of its 20-year history. Age-appropriate classes are available for children as young as 6 months old.

"Children learn musical concepts only until about age 7," DeCorsey said. "After that, the learning pretty much stops. That's why it's so important to start children early."

Rose Williams started in the program when she was 2; and her sister, Lillian, will start this fall.

"We took the Mozart and movement class this past year and it's just incredible how she came out of her shell," Jill Williams said.

The Lawrence classes, led by trained professional musicians, introduce basic music concepts and give hands-on experience to play with a variety of folk, instrumental and percussion instruments.

Appleton mother Jennifer Ganser enrolled her first child, Jackie, in the program when she was a baby for something fun to do. Two more babies and five years later, Ganser believes her three children have gained more than just enjoyment from the classes.

"You can just see them light up when they are there," Ganser said. "We've really seen them progress."

Jackie, now 6, loves music at school and has been asking to take violin and piano lessons, Ganser added.

While music and brain research moves at a slow pace, Hodges has outlined some major findings:

Disproving earlier assumptions that musical activity takes place in the right hemisphere of the brain, the activity occurs with equal vigor in the left — or rational — hemisphere. Music is an emotional and intellectual activity that engages all the brain. Almost.

During performance, there is almost no activity in the frontal lobe, where conscious thought takes place. When Yo-Yo Ma is playing his cello in concert he's not thinking, Hodges argues. All the thought took place earlier and if he were to think now it would impede his playing. He is simply performing, much like a highly trained athlete.

"Music is always a physical activity," Hodges said. "Musicians are small-muscle athletes." And not just the performer. A listener sitting still in a classical concert hall is having the area of the brain that controls motion stimulated. Thus, that convention — not moving during classical performances — is unnatural.

A person with brain damage from a stroke may not be able to speak but can sing because the area that controls music is not damaged, said Shannon de L'Etoile, who heads the music therapy program at the University of Miami.

A therapist will get the patient to sing a phrase, then change it to spoken language with an exaggerated rhythm, and finally to natural language.

"We are rerouting through the healthy part of the brain," de L'Etoile said. "The spinal chord reacts immediately to rhythm."

Such therapy can be used with Parkinson's patients, she added.

And, researchers have learned that autistic children are capable of reproducing patterns of music, which a therapist can translate to language and to unlock the social interactions autism prevents.

"Music makes you smarter because it helps you understand yourself as a human being and your relationship to the world," says Hodges.

Though, all humans are musical, regardless of training or IQ.

"From the least to the most intelligent, everyone can have a meaningful music experience," he said.



Source:Hindustanis.org

Why do all songs are about love





































Do we listen to music when we are in love and we are happy? No, we usually don't. We then listen to the music of our hearts that beat in tune to the one beloved.
We listen to songs about love when it is bad times for our love or when we are lovesick.
Pragmatically the musicians know that songs about suffering love are the most money-making. The reason is that people want somebody to be present near them in times they are in love grief, for somebody to articulate their suffering. It is called empathy in psychology. This is the process when somebody shares the same feelings as you do. Musicians are psychologists. They cure our souls with their music.
On the other hand: too much of sad depressive music catalyzes of your sufferings. Some bands even 'advise' their addressees to jump off the roof. Think one has to perceive that very figuratively. Such suicidal motifs can be mostly found in the repertoire of 'Muse'.
The lexicon of the songs about love is also so crammed with the words like 'broken', 'hurt', 'heart', 'only you'. 'Radiohead' uses also the word 'bruise' as the alternative. And the pronoun 'you' is the most widely used.
The saddest thing is that everybody who listens to a song about love imagines oneself at the place of the singing one and always wants to address the one he/she loves but is unable of that.
Still, songs about love prove that this feeling is not only the chain of chemical reactions. It is more than that…



Source:Hindustanis.org

Straight Edge": Music or Lifestyle?














The Straight Edge or simply abbreviated the 'sXe' of 'sXe' is coined a subculture to represent a particular lifestyle. It advocates abstinence from tobacco, alcohol, and recreational drug use-especially psychoactive and stimulant drug use. Some straight edger's also abstain from promiscuous sexual behavior and caffeine. Although straight edger's do not necessarily identify with a particular world view on social or political issues, many do subscribe to precepts associated with anarchism, vegetarianism–veganism, socialism, environmentalism, and the deep ecology movement.
The difference between vegetarianism and veganism is obvious, vegetarians claim to cut on meat, whereas vegans painstakingly struggle to rescue animals' lives. However, it's a musical trend that teenagers associate the 'sXe' with. In fact, development of the music trend was predetermined by a certain movement. The 'sXe' as a movement emerged alongside hardcore in the early 1980s. Those times parties chased a tendency to consume alcohol, smoke pot and cigarettes. This continued until Ian MacKaye introduced the new concept of the Straight Edge and organized it into a postulate, one couldn't dare to doubt. Not only had he explained all peculiarities of the newly invented style in detail, but also established the 'Minor Threat' band, the first one to promote the 'sXe'. A cross sign was suggested by Ian MacKaye to symbolize the trend. This sign was marked on wrists of underage as an instruction for bar staff not to sell spirits to them in night clubs. The Minor Threat boasts short existence in view of lethal malady of a band member. Their occasional rehearses followed by the band's break up.
The 'sXe' was later reintroduced by the 'Youth of Today' band. At time the trend experienced bitter despondency, in the late 1980s the style was deeply rooted into the European music scene. Still, no single band happens to completely follow the 'sXe's' philosophy, however, a number of them apply its ideas in their



Source:Hindustanis.org

Rap Is More than Music



















This is a style that stays aside all the other music trends. Not aside, but somewhat deeper. The reason is it is a reflection of the race, the plurality of people united by roots and origin. Rap is the culture of Afro-Americans, the continuation of their language and traditions. Rap is a mixture of speech and music, actually it is speech laid on music or beat it's better to say. And when we claim that people are united through music, meaning every single human being on this planet, rap unites the ones close to blood by music and then everybody else, either welcoming or being hostile to a newcomer. What attracts people in rap? Is it catchy? Maybe. Those non-natives to rap often state the flow of speech is too quick and it is difficult to differentiate the words. Sometimes it seems rap music is only for those from the cradle. Foreigners are not invited.
Rap is classified as urban poetry of lyrical resistance. Thus it is not the music for village like country music. It is the gathering power of those united by music in big cities. The aim is to resist the grieves because misfortunes are more dramatic and numerous in urban areas.
Rap does not only speak to the mind and emotions, but speaks to the society all around people, for people. If the words or courage to say those words are not there, the subconscious takes over and the Rap lyrics kick in.
But once captured by the beat, most people - mainly younger ones - begin to hear the words, and the words may describe just how they are feeling that day. If the boss came to work with an agenda to screw everyone, some people will 'feel' the words and the beat, especially when enclosed in a car doing 70 on the freeway. It's something about riding with the music turned full-blast that has a way of absorbing the mind and supplying a means of temporal escape.
Some songs have innocent words that impress upon the mind to be released later at the water cooler. Some choruses are catchy and when sung by certain artist will stay within the subconscious long after. Various rappers have unique voices that some people find attractive or along the same vocal tone as their own voice, which it makes it easier to sing along.
First goes the beat, and then goes the lyrics! It is not as smooth and tender as classical music, not as glossy as pop, but it has the scream of pain of real emotion of the world's harshness. One may even state that rap is the most pain expressing music style. Those who sing it or it is better to say read it revive their feelings not only concerning love, as most of the other styles do. Their message is about life and the problems, especially the ones of the Afro-American people. The music of pain and oppression, rap is a remedy to the latter. Let all the pills be like that!



Source:Hindustanis.org

Top 10 World Music Myths











World music is weird and inaccesible, and only nerds, old people and dreadlocked hippies listen to it. Right? Wrong. World music is way too broad of a genre to create stereotypes about, but people do it anyway. It's time to destroy some of these myths.

1) World music fans are all geeks/old people/hippies/etc.

Lots of geeks listen to world music. So do lots of old people and lots of hippies. So do lots of straightlaced investment bankers, college drama majors, rice farmers, suburban homemakers, hipsters, indigenous tribesmen, Rabbis, Republicans, and... you get the picture. The term "world music" is nebulous, at best, and so is the profile of people who listen to it.

2) World music is just a bunch of weird drumming and chanting.

Sure, there are lots of genres of world music that are percussion-based and which involve chanting. There are also lots of genres of world music that have no percussive elements at all, let alone chanting. Most modern genres of world music, like reggage, are totally accessible, even to pop music fans. And many genres, such as jeli kor poling are remarkably refined and elegant, perfect for a classical music fan.

3) World music is always in another language.

Naturally, world music is often in another language, but certainly not always. ladysmith black mambaze for example, sing the majority of their repertoire in English. They're not alone. A great deal of world music is also instrumental, which deletes the language barrier completely.

4) "World Music" actually means "Third World Music".

It's absolutely true that some of the finest music in the world comes from some of the poorest places in the world, but lots of great music comes out of cultures that are actually quite well-off, and even glamorous! For example, there is nothing at all third-world about Paris Cafe Music.

5) "I've never heard any world music".

Sure you have, and lots of it! Remember the song "Who Let The Dogs Out?" That's a soca song. Remember "It Wasn't Me" and "Mr. Boombastic" by Shaggy? Those would be reggage. Remember Paul Simon's Graceland? That was ladysmith black mambazo taking care of the background vocals. The list goes on and on.

6) World music isn't sexy.

I think this myth must be a derivative of Myth #1: if the only people who listen to world music are old, ugly, dirty or geeky, then the music must not be sexy. I would argue, though, that cesario's evo music is easily as sexy as any American soul or R&B chanteuse's, and reggage is undoubtedly hot and spicy, as are dozens of other genres and acts.

7) World music must not be any good, because they don't play it on the radio.

First of all, world music is a staple at NPR, which has radio stations nationwide... but that's not helping my case with the younger crowd, which is the primary demographic for pop radio. The short answer to this is that world music, because of the bizarre, preconceived notions about it, is harder to sell to young crowds. Being thought of as a nerd is (quote from an actual teenager here) "ugh... like, totally my worst nightmare." Need I say more?

8) You can't sing along to world music.

Allow me to mention The Baha Men's "Who Let The Dogs Out" one more time. Don't you remember the entire summer of 2000, when no one would stop singing along to that song? Well, there's a lot more where that came from.

9) World music all sounds the same.

irish music and classical indian music, for example, sound so mindbogglingly different in every aspect of sound: melody, harmony, rhythm, song structure, etc. that there's literally no way to confuse the two. And, by the way, neither of them sound like drumming and chanting.

10) World music doesn't rock.

Sure, some world music doesn't rock; a lot of it is very subtle and calm. But straight-up reggage rocks like nobody's business. So do gogole brodello and The Pogues and Clifton Chenier and susheela raman. The list goes on and on.



Source:Hindustanis.org

The Future of downloadable music

it's the big-bucks battle over the future of downloadable music and a winner is emerging. while the majors are still plotting their course of action and going through trial phases, smaller, trend setting music companies are paving a golden path directly to the consumer. their product? subscription services.
the subscription based music service is quite simple. users pay a set fee per month/quarter/year via a secure server and are allowed access to the music company's library of downloadable music. the partner record labels are paid a percentage of the user fees, music publishers are paid a small fee per download and the balance goes to the music company providing the service.
a notable pioneer in the subscription service model is spinrecords.com who sell unlimited downloads per month (mp3 format) for $4.95. with a catalog comprised mainly of relatively unknown artists / labels, spinrecords.com still has to compete with established powerhouses like mp3.com and besonic.com, music companies who allow unlimited downloads for free. another, more prominent, pioneer is emusic.com who are currently selling their subscription service for $19.99 per month (quarterly and yearly packages are also available). with 125,000 titles in their catalog, including established artists like download, dj spooky and haujobb, emusic might become the first profitable success in the virtual music world. at the very least, they will be laying the groundwork and others will follow. partnering with numerous mid-size record labels has allowed emusic to build a fairly comprehensive catalog encompassing a wide variety of genres. i signed up for the monthly subscription at emusic and was able to download as many tracks (or full cds) as i wanted. i felt guilty though, for $19.99, i downloaded a good 20 cds (mp3 format), worth far more than the piddling 20 bucks i paid.
the success of the subscription service will depend on both the marketing and the partner labels. to garner public interest and make subscription services a viable alternative to mp3 piracy, subscription services may very well require the participation of major labels, or, at the very least, mini-major labels with established and popular artists in their roster. at the moment, i'm very satisfied with the subscription service at emusic but i'm not the average music consumer. i'm not interested in downloading music by artists like madonna, britney spears or limp bizkit. with few exceptions, the major names on major labels don't appeal to me but to the average consumer, those big names and those popular songs are very important. partnering with 'established artist' labels will play a vital role in the success of these new subscription services.
the major labels are now, finally, moving ahead with downloadable music for the consumer. emi recently announced that it would be selling over 100 cds from its music catalog in downloadable format (windows media and liquid audio) through well known online retailers. sounds pretty simple.. but it wasn't. finding the retailers who sell emi music wasn't easy. thinking tower records would be up for the job, i jumped over to their site and found countless audio clips, but no downloadable music for sale. amazon.com was next on my list - nada, zilch. hmv.com had a download section but no downloads for sale. i tried cdnow.com's download section and all i found were single song sales in liquid audio format. perhaps, in the interest of trend setting (or sales!), emi and its retail partners could have made the process a whole lot easier by clearly identifying an emi download section, or at least a 'pay for downloads' section. my web search finally proved fruitful at virginjamcast.com, where entire cds are available to purchase in windows media format or liquid audio. sony music entertainment have made things far easier for the consumer. in their digital downloads section, various tracks by a small number of sony artists are offered for sale. the price, $2.49 us per song. pretty steep. universal has now entered the digital download bonanza when they recently announced they would release tracks, on a trial basis, from artists such as blink 182 and luciano pavarotti at major online retailers. perhaps in the future the majors will be offering subscription services too, hopefully consumer demand will dictate that it would be the best course of action.
as for me, i'm sticking with emusic.com, they've got the right idea, and the music i like.




Source:Hindustanis.org

Stringed Music Instrument: Violin






















The parts of the violin

The violin is a carefully made hollow wooden box, with a neck protruding from the top, and a internal sound post connecting the front (belly) and the back. The sides of the violin, curiously, are called ribs. The belly is reinforced by an internal bass bar, which runs vertically through the instrument underneath the lowest string. The raised outline on the outside of the violin surface is called a perflin.

The four strings run from a tailpiece attached to the base of the violin, across an intricately carved wooden bridge, then upward just above the fingerboard. At the top end of the fingerboard, the strings cross the nut, a very small second bridge, mounted just slightly above the fingerboard. They then enter the pegbox, where they are wound around their tuning pegs, which are mounted sideways through tightly fitting holes in the pegbox. The tip of the pegbox is ornamented with a carved wooden scroll.

The bridge of a violin has two purposes. First, it holds the strings in an arched configuration, permitting each to be touched separately by the bow. The bridge also transmits the sound vibrations of the strings to the belly, from which they are transmitted to the back by the sound post.

Materials of the violin

Generally the belly, the sound post, and the bass bar are made of spruce a light but strong softwood. The back, ribs, neck, pegbox, scroll, and bridge are of maple, a hardwood. The choice of woods is basically the same as in the piano where a hardwood bridge is attached to a spruce soundboard, mounted on a hardwood frame.

The fingerboard of a violin is of ebony.Some old violins have ivory fingerboards.

Strings were originally made of gut. Such strings are still often used in histroically accurate perfom dance of music from the 18th century and earlier. However, they have a tendency to go out of tune and snap more easily than modern strings, which are made from metal. Modern A, D and G strings are usually metal-cored and wound with metal for greater mass in order to vibrate at a lower pitch, with the E (top) string being a metal mono-filament of steel. Synthetic cored strings (wound with metal) are also employed today; they combine some of the benefits of gut strings with greater longevity and tuning stability.

The hair of the bow is traditionally horse hair, although many cheaper bows use synthetic material. The hair must be frequently rubbed with rosin in order to grip the strings and cause them to vibrate.







Physics of Violin Acoustics

It has been known for a long time that the thickness of the wood and its physical qualities govern the sound of a stringed instrument such as the violin. The sound and tone of the violin is determined by how the belly and back plates of the violin behave acoustically, according to modes or schemes of movement determined by German physicist ernst chladni Patterns of the nodes (places of no movement) made by sand sprinkled on the plates with the plate vibrated at certain frequencies are called "Chladni patterns", and are often used by luthiers to verify their work before assembling the instrument. A scienstic includes a discussion of how the properties of the wood determines where the nodes occur, whether the plates move with end or diagonally opposite points rising together or in various mixed modes.



Source:Hindustanis.org

How to Win Friends and Influence People in the Music Business























People who say "It's better to give than to receive" are flat out lying. It's always better to be on the receiving end of any transaction (unless you're receiving insults or incoming fire). Keep that sentiment in mind as you build relationships in the music business.

Let me explain.

Several years ago, I took a phone call from a local artist named Mickie. She asked if I had a need for free display banners in exchange for some free ads in the music magazine I published at the time, to promote an upcoming exhibit of her artwork.

I told her I wasn't sure if I could do it, but I'd be happy to discuss it. Before we hung up, she set a time to stop by my office.

Mickie arrived on time for her appointment and immediately pulled out a sketch pad and started asking me questions about the type of banners I might need. I had never given it much thought, really. She talked about the different shapes, sizes and uses: banners that hang over a stage, banners that hang from the front of a stage, banners that hang in front of tables at trade shows, banners that hang from the wall during sponsored events.

We talked about banner lengths, colors, logos ... Mickie even helped me craft a short, catchy slogan to go under my logo. She sketched out possible designs. I began to visualize how these banners would look. After 10 or 15 minutes of this I was excited about the many ways I could use them to promote my business. Best of all, it wouldn't cost me a dime. I was psyched!

As Mickie was gathering her things, almost as if it were an afterthought, she pulled out a small envelope and handed it to me. "Oh, here's a camera-ready ad for my exhibit," she said. "It's sized for your paper and ready to go. If you could run this in the next couple of issues, I'd really appreciate it."

"Absolutely!" I said.

After she left, I felt good about the transaction. I soon realized that I'd been manipulated by a pro -- but I didnt feel used or taken advantage of. Mickie had gone to great lengths to keep my needs in mind and make sure I felt I was getting value out of our relationship. She knew that, by doing this, she would ultimately get what she wanted: a free ad in my paper.

A more close-minded marketer would have approached me by focusing on the exhibit and why the artist deserved exposure ... and might have even asked, "What would I have to do to get a free ad in your paper?" That would have put me in the awkward position of having to figure out how to give this person what he/she wants while satisfying my own needs.

Which method would take you further in your music business relationships?

Think back to a situation in which someone made a great effort to give you something you wanted (keep it clean). How did it make you feel? What effect did it have on your opinion of that person?

Keep that happy state in mind, because it's your job to dole out a heapin' helpin' of that feeling to as many people as you can.

So now that you realize it's better to receive than give, from this day forward, make sure people receive a lot more from you. By doing so, youll end up getting a lot more in return.



Source:Hindustanis.org


Music industry divided over digital future










With global music sales down for a seventh straight year, the talk at an annual industry meeting in Cannes, France, has become heated over how to develop digital sales against competition from the dreaded F word--free.
Global sales are expected to be down again for 2006 despite digital sales almost doubling to $2 billion and the popularity of music being as strong as ever.
Critics of the major players in the industry argue that they have been distracted by the fight against piracy and in doing so, hindered the growth of the legal business.
In response, the accused argue that they had little choice.
Many people around the world tell me that we`ve handled our problems in an incorrect manner but no one tells me what we should have done," John Kennedy, the head of the industry`s trade body IFPI, told news agecies in an interview.
"Free is just impossible to compete with".
Much of the debate at the gathering on the French coast has centered around the concept of digital rights management or DRM which can restrict the use of music bought online and was introduced in a bid to contain piracy.
Its supporters say DRM also offers alternative methods such as subscription or advertising-supported services as the music cannot then be offered onto peer-to-peer networks.
But one result of DRM is that tracks bought legally from Web sites such as Rhapsody cannot be used on the market-leading iPod as they are not compatible, potentially restricting the growth of legal sales.
"DRM is like polonium to some people," Kennedy said. "Digital rights management is exactly that, it`s the management of digital rights and if we weren`t managing it the headlines would be `irresponsible music industry ... creates anarchy.`"



Source:Hindustanis.org

Intro to Classical Music

A Beginners Guide to Classical Music

What is classical music?

When asked the question, “what is classical music?”, elevator music comes to the minds of many people. Although it is grossly inaccurate to say that classical music is elevator music, the two terms are similar in one way. They are both a generic term applied to a type of music. Classical music encompasses many styles of music spanning over 700 years.

Origin and Definition

The term classical music originates from the Latin term classicus, meaning taxpayer of the highest class. Slowly after making its way through the French, German, and English languages, one of the earliest definitions of the word meant “classical, formall, orderlie, in due or fit ranke; also, approved, authenticall, chiefe, principall.” Today, one of the ways Merriam-Webster defines classical is “of, relating to, or being music in the educated European tradition that includes such forms as art song, chamber music, opera, and symphony as distinguished from folk or popular music or jazz.”

Periods of Classical Music

Music historiographers classified the six periods of music by stylistic differences.

  • Before 1400 – medieval characterized by Gregorian chant, mostly religious
  • 1400-1600 – reniassance– increase of secular music, madrigals, and art song
  • 1600-1750 –baroque – known for its intricate ornamentation
  • 1750-1820 – classical– balance and structure
  • 1820-1900 – romantic emotional, large, programmatic
  • Beyond 1900 – 20th century – limitless

Styles within Classical Music

Many styles of music exist within classical music; the most recognizable being the symphony opera choral works, chamber music, Gregorian chant, the madrigal, and the Mass.

Where to Begin

  • For starters, begin with what you already know. You are probably more familiar with classical music than you think. You may hear it while dining in a restaurant, shopping, watching TV, or hear it in the movies. With what’s available on the internet, it can be very easy to find a song you've heard in almost any movie or t. shows.

  • Listen to and research popular composers like beethoven,mozart,haydn,brahms

  • Research the top ten classical musical albums or drop by the top ten symphpnies you should own page. Don't hesitate to read the reviews and find out what others are saying.
  • attend a classical musical performance in your area.
  • Listen to what you know more than once and by several other artists. Mozart’s biographer says in his book that “The masterpieces of the Romans and Greeks please more and more through repeated reading, and as one’s taste is refined – the same is true for both expert and amateur with respect to the hearing of Mozart’s music [or classical music].” The bottom line: the more you know a piece the better it becomes.

Above all else, don't be hesitant.

The sheer breadth of classical music can be quite daunting, but as soon as you find something you like, stick with it. Let that piece of music be your starting point. Listen to other pieces by the same composer, then branch off into similar types of music by different composers, and so on and so forth. Pretty soon, you will see that classical music isn't so scary after all.




Source:Hindustanis.org

Top 10 Las Vegas Attractions


















With so much to do it is always a good idea to have a short list of the best Las Vegas attractions. Some are free and some require a fee but you can be guaranteed a good time. Las Vegas fun can range from the adult only type to fun for the entire family.
1) shark reef at mandalay bay
This Las Vegas attraction features Sharks, tropical aquariums, a jelly fish exhibit as well as a few crocodiles. A great way to spend a few hours. You will come in contact with numerous species of sharks, marine invertebrates and rays. All in a ancient sunken temple themed locale. Walk through a tunnel where sharks surround you and put your fingers in the touch tank. No other Las Vegas attraction allows you to touch living sea animals.

2) manhattan express rollercoaster

Of all the Las Vegas attractions this one will get you moving the fastest. Located in the New York/New York Las Vegas resort this Roller coaster will take you to heights of 203 feet, drops of 144 feet and speeds up to 67 MPH, It features the world's first "heartline" twist and dive maneuver, allowing riders to experience the thrilling force of negative g's! I nearly lost my lunch on this one but it was well worth it. The ultimate Las Vegas attraction.

3)las vegas attractions-bellagio fountains

I'll come clean, I can be a romantic guy at times and this place has a tendency to make me soft. The music gets going and the water dances back and forth. In the early evening the light show along with the fine mist that fills the air is magical. This is the romantic Las Vegas attraction

4) eiffel tower -paris las vegas

This Las Vegas attraction gets you high in the air above Las Vegas. The replica Eiffel Tower at Paris Las Vegas is an exact reproduction of one of Europe’s most famous landmarks, only at 1/2 scale. You can to ride to the top, and experience a panoramic view of the valley, from 460 feet above the ground. There is also the Eiffel Tower Restaurant, located on the 11th floor. Las Vegas attractions do not get better than this.
5) las vegas attractions-games
This is a huge arcade right on the strip that features an enormous rock climbing wall. Right in the showcase shopping area adjacent to the MGM Grand you can spend hours on state of the art arcade games.
6) adventuredome at circus circus
The perfect Las Vegas attraction for the kids. In the summer this is a an air-conditioned theme park that you will think was delivered from heaven. Incredible thrill rides and a joy for the kids. It's free to walk around, but you will have to pay to get wet on Rim Runner or get sick on Chaos.
7) star trek the experience
At the Las Vegas Hilton they are converting average people into trekkies every day. This ride takes you aboard the enterprise and into space. If you're a fan of the show and even if you're not you will enjoy this.
8) fremont experience
A free show in the streets of Downtown Las Vegas. The music is loud and the lights dance above your head. It is an experience. Shows begin at 8:30, for free. The best free Las Vegas attraction
9) the stratosphere
With the tallest rollercoaster in the world and a great view this is an attraction that you will not want to miss. The tower is now a Las Vegas trademark and why not go to the top of it. Ride the rollercoaster or have dinner, it's a ton of fun.
10) lion habitat at the mhm grand
It's not much, but, you can take pictures with baby lions at this attraction or just watch them walk around. I always seem to find myself standing there for twenty minutes watching a cat sleep. I don't know why, try it and explain it to me. This is the Las vegas attraction where you can get a picture with a huge cat.




Source:Hindustanis.org

2007-Jan-20 - Papa Denny Dies

Denny Doherty's voice might have just been the best tourist enticement the state of California ever had.

Doherty, who sang the lead on "California Dreamin,' " and helped drive many of the other harmonized hits from the brief, but brilliant run of the Mamas and the Papas in the 1960s, has died at his home in Canada. He was 66.

According to his Los Angeles agent's office, Doherty passed away in his sleep on Thursday night. The Associated Press, citing Doherty's sister, said the performer died Friday.

With Doherty's death, three of the pop group's four founding members have now passed. john phillips the group's main composer and author of its complex vocal sound, succumbed to heart failure in 2001 at age 65. "Mama" cass elliot, the breakout star, died of a heart attack in 1974 at age 32.

At 62, Michelle Phillips, the Golden State-praising group's lone native Californian, is the lone original link to the Mamas and the Papas' reign of the AM dial.

More often than not, the big voices coming through car speakers in those days belonged to either Doherty or Elliot. The two, an unrequited love match, at least from Elliot's end, tended to trade lead vocals on hits such as "Monday, Monday" (Doherty), "Go Where You Wanna Go" (Elliot), "I Saw Her Again" (Doherty) and "Dream a Little of Dream of Me" (Elliot).

And then there was "California Dreamin'," the first hit, the signature hit--and the quintessential hit of the Los Angeles music scene, circa 1966.

The way Doherty told the Kansas City Star in 2005, "California Dreamin' " wasn't just a turning point for the Mamas and the Papas, but for the group's fans, as well.

"They [would] go...'I was living in my father's Oldsmobile in Minnesota, and I heard that song and I just went to California,' " Doherty said in the newspaper.

Born in Nova Scotia, Canada, on Nov. 29, 1940, Doherty recounted his pop life and adventures in the live show, "Dream a Little Dream: The Nearly True Story of the Mamas & the Papas," which he performed along with the so-called Dream Band from the 1990s on.

"Nearly" was the key to the show's title.

"As grace slick said, 'If you remember the '60s, you weren't there,' " Doherty would tell audiences, per his official Website. "So, some of what I'm going to tell you tonight didn't happen...The stories will be stacked up, melded and muddled together and time will be warped."

Storytelling was something of a Mamas and the Papas tradition. The group's 1967 hit "Creeque Alley" was the group's history with a catchy chorus ("And no one's getting fat except Mama Cass...") and a flute solo.

A chronological take on Doherty's Mamas and the Papas heyday would look like this: Meets Elliot in New York City, circa 1963; performs with the Phillipses—marrieds John and Michelle—in 1964; sees trio expand to a quartet thanks to the addition of Elliot; inks a record deal with the group in 1965; hits the charts with "California Dreamin' " in 1966.

For Doherty, who in his stage show described his life as an attempt to make it across a river by skipping from one stone to the other, the first blast of success was as solid footing as he'd had.

"Driving down Sunset Strip in a brand new, red Cadillac convertible with your music blaring out the radio?" one of Doherty's "Dream a Little Dream" stories went, per his site. "No denying that feels like a flat stone should."

But Doherty and band mates were too restless to stay in one place, or stone, too long. Or, with one partner too long.

Doherty once described the Mamas and the Papas' group dynamic like this to the Cleveland Plain Dealer: "The big woman was in love with me, but I was in love with the cute blonde, and she was married."

The big woman was Elliot. The cute blonde was Michelle Phillips, who'd wed John Phillips as a teen.

Their world being rock 'n' roll, sex wasn't the only the issue. Drugs were, too—Doherty drank; John Phillips drank and used, and decades later, after kicking cocaine and heroin habits, required a liver transplant.

The Mamas and the Papas flamed out in 1968, after four studio albums, and one memorable performance at 1967's Monterey Pop Festival alongside the likes of Jimi Hendrix, Janis Joplin and the Who.

The group reformed in 1972 for People Like Us, an album dismissed in Matthew Greenwald's liner notes for All the Leaves Are Brown: The Golden Era Collection as a "near-disposable 'contractual obligation.' "

Elliot's early death brought an end the original Mamas and the Papas, but not to the group itself. Doherty and John Phillips hit the road in the 1980s and the 1990s, initially with Phillips' TV star daughter mackenzie phillips and Spanky & Our Gang's Spanky McFarlane.

Doherty, John Phillips and Michelle Phillips, who'd long ago left pop music for TV soaps, performed together anew as the Mamas and the Papas at the group's 1998 Rock and Roll Hall of Fame induction. Elliot's part was handled by her daughter, singer Owen Elliot.

While in life, Elliot seemed hopelessly in love with Doherty; in her death, Doherty seemed hopelessly devoted to her memory.

"If it wasn't for her, there would be no group, I'd like to get that across," Doherty said of his stage show in the Kansas City Star. "And that she didn't die from a frickin' ham sandwich."



Source:Hindustanis.org

Thursday, January 18, 2007

2007-Jan-3 - The Playsomething Academy











Welcome to The Academy!
In October 2004, Playsomething launched "The Academy". An energetic alternative to traditional methods of learning to play a musical instrument, Academy numbers have swelled to over 300 students.
Tuition is available on Guitar, Drums, Keyboards, Vocals and Harmonica within the Academy's teaching studios.
Classes are taught on a group basis with a maximum of 6 students per group. The emphasis very much being geared towards learning whilst having fun.
We believe that group classes put less pressure on an individual student and give the student the opportunity to benefit from learning within a group dynamic in which they also learn and gain experience from other members of their class.
The Academy boasts as many adults as children and caters for all budding musicians whatever the age.Classes are organised as much as possible on an age and ability basis.
Classes are 45 minutes in length and the class schedule mirrors the school term in that a term of lessons is 12 - 14 weeks long and will have half-term breaks and holiday breaks.
Towards the end of each term, selected students are organised into 'bands' who learn and rehearse a set of songs and work towards an end of term live performance to which family and friends are invited.
The Academy Offers:
A fresh approach to music tuition
For students of all age groups and abilities
With the emphasis on learning in a group environment
Developing communication skills
Live performance
And above all....fun

The Academy also runs several specialised Summer Holiday courses.
Why not Playsomething?










Source:Hindustanis.org

2007-Jan-3 - Electronic musical instrument


An electronic musical instrument is a musical instrumentelectronics. In contrast, the term electric instrument is used to mean instruments whose sound is produced mechanically, and only amplified or altered electronically - for example an electric guitar. Usually the instrument will have some way of controlling the sound, such as by adjusting the pitch, frequency, or duration of each note. that produces its sounds using

All electric and electronic musical instruments can be viewed as a subset of audio signal processing applications. Simple electronic musical instruments are sometimes called sound effects; the border between sound effects and actual musical instruments is often hazy.

French composer and engineer Edgard Varèse created a variety of compositions using electronic horns, whistles, and tape. Most notably, he wrote Poème Électronique for the Phillips pavilion at the Brussels World Fair in 1958.

Electronic musical instruments are now widely used in most styles of music. The development of new electronic musical instruments continues to be a highly active and interdisciplinary field of research. Specialized conferences, notably the International Conference on New interfaces for musical expression, have organized to report cutting edge work, as well as to provide a showcase for artists who perform or create music with new electronic music instruments.






















In the broadest sense, the very first electrified musical instrument was the Denis d'or, dating from 1753. It was followed by the Clavecin électrique by the Frenchman Jean-Baptiste de Laborde in 1761.

The first purely electronic musical instrument was the Telharmonium, built by Thaddeus Cahill in 1906. Employing electric generators and tonewheels to produce notes, it had a length of 60ft and a weight of 200 tons; because of a lack of suitable loudspeakers at that time, the music was distributed over the telephone network.

One of the many instruments constructed in the following decades was the Theremin, invented by Leon Theremin in 1917, which used a pair of heterodyned vacuum tube RF oscillators to make an audible tone that varied in pitch depending on the distance, and thus the capacitance, between the user and the instrument. This was followed in 1928 by the Ondes Martenot which had a keyboard as well as several auxiliary controllers.

The sound of the Ondes Martenot is used extensively in the Turangalîla-Symphonie and other works by Olivier Messiaen. However, these were not true synthesizers in the modern sense, as they were not configurable to produce a range of complex sounds by additive or subtractive synthesis, instead generating single pure tones with controllable pitch, amplitude and vibrato.














Ca. 1929 Friedrich Trautwein invented the Trautonium in Berlin. It was played with a resistor wire which has to be pressed against a metal plate. Oskar Sala was one of the first players and continued development until his death in 2002. Paul Hindemith wrote some compositions for it.

These early electronic instruments produced only pure tones and were frequently used to make avant garde music. In April 1935, Laurens Hammond introduced the Hammond tonewheel organ, which generated complex tones using an electro-mechanical principle derived from the design of the Telharmonium. Later Hammond used the Leslie speaker to achieve special modulation effects, and the resulting Hammond organ sound is still regarded as the benchmark for the "electric organ" sound. This sound can be simulated by many modern synthesizers and digital samplers.

[edit] Synthesizers

The most commonly used electronic instruments are synthesizers, so-called because they artificially generate sound using techniques such as additive, subtractive, FMphysical modelling synthesis to create sounds. and

Dr. Robert Moog introduced the first practical commercial modern music synthesizer with his Moog synthesizer. This instrument used a series of tone generators with keys that would adjust the tone generators' pitch. Moog resolved to sell Theremins to gain enough money to engineer this synthesizer.






The first digital synthesizers were academic experiments in sound synthesis using digital computers. FM synthesis was developed for this purpose, as a way of generating complex sounds digitally with the smallest number of computational operations per sound sample.

[edit] Modern electronic musical instruments

While synthesizers dominate the current market, other instruments such as the radiodrum are being developed by people such as Peter Driessen and Andrew Schloss as an alternative to the standard user interfaces of traditional instruments. These modern electronic instruments seek to improve the musician's ability to express music, rather than experimenting with tone which can then be done by synthesizers.


Source:Hindustanis.org


2007-Jan-9 - THE julie davis school of music
















The Julie Davis Music School at Swallow Hill offers classes and private lessons in folk, roots and traditional music — guitar, banjo, harp, dulcimer, fiddle, voice/singing, piano, harmonica, drums, recorder, mandolin, tin whistle, percussion/drums, autoharp, songwriting, music theory, using a sound system, the music business ... and more! Our faculty of over 50 professional musicians are dedicated to offering a friendly, low-pressure environment for helping Denver area students of all ages and levels learn to make music. All Swallow Hill classes and lessons are created with the philosophy that music is fun, and learning music should be fun, too.

Whether your passion is Blues, Bluegrass, Irish/Celtic, Cajun/Zydeco, Texas Swing, Singer-Songwriter, Traditional Folk, Ragtime, Gypsy, Acoustic, Electric, Rock, Folk Rock, World Beat, Afro-Brazilian, Old Time or New Age... We've got the music class for you!

More than just a music school, Swallow Hill is a community of musicians and music lovers. Come join us!



Source:Hindustanis.org

2007-Jan-16 - ‘Idol’ alum McPhee cuts CD, and expectations

LOS ANGELES - When 2006 “American Idol” runner-up Katharine McPhee rushed off the road and into the studio last fall to begin working on her debut album, she quickly realized the art of the compromise.

Indeed, while some tracks for the self-titled set, due Jan. 30 via RCA, were fully formed demos from veteran songwriters, others were crafted with McPhee’s input from the ground up by Timbaland sideman Nate “Danja” Hills, Babyface and Kara DioGuardi.

McPhee fell particularly in love with two tracks from producer Ryan Leslie, but they wound up not making the cut. “I’m learning that’s the way it goes in this business,” she says. “You give and you take.”

Due to McPhee’s post-“Idol” touring commitments, RCA hasn’t had much setup time for the project; the first single, “Over It,” was to hit U.S. radio outlets Jan. 15.

“We basically had two or three months to go from start to zero and make a complete album,” RCA Music Group senior VP of A&R Steve Ferrera says. “It’s not like a normal artist signing, where you develop them, find the material and refine as you go. Because of the momentum of ‘Idol,’ we had to get this thing out.”

In contrast to “Idol” stars like Bo Bice and Taylor Hicks who had already spent years pursuing a music career, McPhee’s prior experience was limited to musical theater. Once in album-making mode, she also struggled with putting her own stamp on material that was already written.

That said, McPhee and Ferrera say they’re thrilled with the finished product, which they both describe as a “rhythm pop album.”

“One of the first things I asked her was, ‘What’s on your iPod?’ ” Ferrera says. “She said, ‘I’m 22 years old. I want to make a record kids my own age will want to listen to, à la Christina Aguilera, Justin Timberlake, Nelly Furtado and Fergie.’ We set out to make a record that had those components to it, and also a few really big ballads like she sang on the show.”

Ferrera is now drafting a live band for McPhee in advance of a busy slate of TV performances this month. Meanwhile, McPhee is taking a proactive approach to her fan base, even personally responding to friends who have signed up on her MySpace page. “Little things like that make the difference to fans, and they love it,” she says.



Source:Hindustanis.org

2007-Jan-16 - Dance to 167 bands at once

Pop heavyweights Elton John, Stevie Wonder and Paul McCartney all contributed to one of last year’s most audacious, instantly classic albums. And, chances are, they’ve yet to hear it; or if they have, they surely have no clue it was produced by a 25-year-old biomedical engineer in Pittsburgh, Penn.

By day, laptop wunderkind Gregg Gillis (aka Girl Talk) labors in a cubicle crunching research and development data at a medical instrumentation company. He won’t reveal the name of the operation, because — get this — his employers still don’t know why he cuts out early on Fridays (hint: to play sweat-inducing weekend gigs all across the country and as far as Australia).

In addition to his wild on-stage persona (he often strips down to his boxer shorts), Gillis’ conservative co-workers have no clue about “Night Ripper” (Illegal Art), his third CD since 2002, but the first to resonate with a broader audience due to the accessibility of his “source material.” More than a continuous mix tape of pop hits and booty-shaking beats, “Night Ripper” is a staggering exercise in technical mastery and determination. Cutting, cramming and meticulously layering between 200 and 250 samples from 167 contemporary and classic artists (everyone from Madonna and Black Eyed Peas to Nirvana), Gillis has taken the notion of a “mashup” way beyond the next level.

When Danger Mouse (half of Grammy-nominated duo Gnarls Barkley) released “The Grey Album” in 2004, listeners and critics alike were blown away by the artful combination of bits from The Beatles’ “White Album” and Jay-Z’s “Black Album.” Yet, as impressive as “The Grey Album” still is, the sheer scope of “Night Ripper” is all the more extraordinary (just ask Beck, who contracted Gillis to do a remix late last year).

Gillis juggles 167 artists — not two — on 16 tracks, which means you’re hearing roughly a dozen artists (sometimes six at once) all in the span of a couple minutes. The raw, often thrashing results can be a bit jarring to the virgin ear. Then again, rocking out to “Night Ripper” is not unlike being serenaded by the chaotic, fast-paced cacophony of a city street: cell phones, car stereos and nearby TVs all blast fragments of tunes ad nauseum.

“We’re living in A.D.D. times. At mainstream clubs, it may not be as extreme as my album, but they only play like a minute of each song,” says Gillis, “But I’ve never considered myself a DJ and ‘Night Ripper’ really wasn’t a conscious decision to comment on all that. The idea from day one was to recontextualize familiar pop music and twist it into new weird forms. To a lot of people it’s probably kitschy, but I take the music very seriously.”

That’s a good thing, too. Ever since 2 Live Crew caused a stir by appropriating Roy Orbison’s “Pretty Woman,” sampling little bits has been getting artists into big trouble. Somehow, though, Gillis remains decidedly undaunted by the intellectual property can of worms ‘Night Ripper’ could become if even just one artist throws a legal conniption fit (it probably won’t be 2 Live Crew).

“We haven’t had any problems so far, which is a good sign. If anything my album’s a promotional tool. I probably get five to 10 emails a day asking about specific samples,” he explains, “My perspective is no one’s picking up my album rather than someone else’s album I sample, so it’s not hurting the artists. This has always been an artistic pursuit rather than a financial one. You know, I do have a day job.”

Once upon a time, musicians had to ditch their steady gigs and start from scratch to pursue their musical dreams full-time. Today, Gillis is proof that a persistent weekend warrior with a passion for experimentation — and a load of “source material” — need not quit either.

And, chances are, we’ll be seeing a lot more like him.

“This remix culture where everything is recycled is a sign of the times,” says Gillis, “Every kid uses Photoshop and every kid downloads images to manipulate them. Pretty soon audio mixing programs are going to become a lot more user-friendly and with every song that comes out there’s going to be fifth graders remixing it for fun. And that’s cool.”


Source:Hindustanis.org